concise.news
OriginalSourceThe Daily BeastUnited StatesOwner: People IncorporatedLeanLeftCredibilityPublished02:53 UTCRatings: AllSides, MBFCSourceThe Daily BeastUnited StatesOwner: People IncorporatedLeanLeftCredibilityPublished02:53 UTCRatings: AllSides, MBFC

“Stunning Reason Behind Hegseth Impeachment Fail Exposed”

“The stunning reason why the bid to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth failed has been exposed. The impeachment effort against Hegseth was formally introduced in the House on Monday by outgoing Republican congressman Thomas Massie, for alleged constitutional violations and abuses of power.”

Impeachment bid against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth failed 211-204 in the House.

Key points

  • Impeachment articles against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth were formally introduced in the House.
  • The House vote blocked the articles from reaching the floor, 211-204.
  • Massie was the only Republican to vote with Democrats; 11 Democrats were absent.
  • Pelosi and other absent Democrats influenced the tally, with some attending other events.
  • The defeat ends Massie's effort to move separate votes on impeachment in the current Congress.
Read at The Daily Beast

Other reports

How it got here

  1. The Daily Beast publishes the article.

  2. concise.news reads it.

  3. Grouped with 39 other reports as story 2.

  4. The Brief ranks it 2nd.

    2
    Politics

    House takes up procedural vote on Hegseth impeachment.

    Republicans refer the measure to committee, 211-204; it alleges Hegseth illegally continued the Iran war.

    SourcesAl Jazeera23:53 UTCCNN02:14 UTCEuronews05:28 UTCNPR12:15 UTCThe Washington Times13:15 UTCThe Washington Post13:27 UTCLos Angeles Times13:33 UTCForbes13:42 UTCand 32 more
    2

    House takes up procedural vote on Hegseth impeachment.

    Republicans refer the measure to committee, 211-204; it alleges Hegseth illegally continued the Iran war.
    SourcesAl Jazeera23:53 UTCCNN02:14 UTCEuronews05:28 UTCNPR12:15 UTCThe Washington Times13:15 UTCThe Washington Post13:27 UTCLos Angeles Times13:33 UTCForbes13:42 UTCand 32 more