Australian government defends under-16 social media ban in court.
Reddit and a libertarian group say the law is over-broad and restricts youths’ political communication.
“Government lawyers argued that social media use posed risks to children, and action is needed to protect them.”
Australia defends social media ban for under-16s in court
“High Court contest over social media ban tests children’s right to political free speech”
“Reddit blasts Australia's 'inept' social media ban as court challenge begins”
“Australia’s highest court hears challenges to social media ban for children - AP News”
“Australia's highest court hears challenges to social media ban for children”
“Australia’s highest court hears challenges to social media ban for children - Washington Times”
“Reddit calls Australia’s under-16 social media ban ‘inept’ in court”
“Reddit is challenging Australia’s ‘inept’ social media ban for under-16s”
“Australia's social media ban challenged by Reddit and rights group in court”
“Australia's highest court hears challenges to social media ban for children”
“Australia social media teen ban a 'modest' step, says government in top court challenge - Reuters”
“Australia social media teen ban a 'modest' step, says government in top court challenge”
Al Jazeera publishes the article.
concise reads it.
Grouped with 14 other reports as story 1.
The Brief ranks it 1st.
Reddit and a libertarian group say the law is over-broad and restricts youths’ political communication.